|

AMA PRAISES PROPOSAL TO RE-WRITE ROADLESS RULES
The
American Motorcyclist Association (AMA) applauds
an announcement made by U.S. Agriculture Secretary
Ann Veneman today that may give off-highway motorcyclists
and all-terrain vehicle riders a new opportunity
to protect multiple-use recreation on almost 60
million acres of national forest.
Secretary Veneman, whose department oversees
the U.S. Forest Service, announced a new plan for
developing rules to govern activities in so-called
roadless areas in national forests and grasslands.
While the almost 60 million acres is called roadless,
it contains thousands of miles of dirt roads and
trails used by motorcyclists, all-terrain vehicle
users, horse riders, hikers and others.
Under the new plan, governors would work with
federal officials to make rules regulating the roadless
areas in their states. The governors would have
18 months after this new proposal becomes final
to submit their petitions with their specifics to
the Forest Service. The Forest Service then would
go through a rulemaking process, including soliciting
public comment, before announcing final rules for
roadless areas in a particular state.
"This is great news not only for off-highway
motorcyclists and ATV riders, but for horse riders,
bicyclists and others as well," said Edward Moreland,
AMA vice president for government relations.
"We opposed the original roadless initiative
because it didn't provide for enough comment at
the local level. This new effort should give the
public an opportunity to let their governors, and
federal officials, know how important it is to maintain
existing recreational opportunities," Moreland said.
The announcement marks the latest step to deal
with the controversial roadless initiative, finalized
by the Clinton administration in January 2001, to
ban road-building and commercial activities on almost
60 million acres of roadless land. Even though those
regulations stated that "Nothing in this rule is
intended to prohibit the authorized construction
or maintenance of motorized or non-motorized trails,"
the AMA remained concerned that the rule could lead
to widespread road and trail closures as feeder
roads were not maintained.
There are 39 states with roadless areas on national
forest land, but just 12 states contain 56.6 million
acres, or 97 percent. Those states are Alaska, Arizona,
California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New
Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming.
The roadless initiative has been the subject
of litigation in Alaska, Idaho, Utah, North Dakota,
Wyoming and the District of Columbia. In 2001 a
federal judge in Idaho issued an order blocking
implementation of the roadless initiative as a result
of a lawsuit filed by the state of Idaho and others.
The suit alleged the Clinton administration violated
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by
deciding on the roadless rules before involving
the public in the rule-making.
In July 2003, a federal judge in Wyoming blocked
implementation of the roadless rule.
The Bush administration feared even further legal
action.
"The prospect of endless lawsuits represents
neither progress, nor certainty for communities,"
Veneman said in her announcement in Boise, Idaho.
"Our announcements today illustrate our commitment
to working closely with the nation's governors to
meet the needs of local communities, and to maintaining
the undeveloped character of the most pristine areas
of the national forest system."
While the new rules are being considered, the
roadless areas will be governed by an interim directive
that bars road construction unless personally approved
by U.S. Forest Service Chief Dale Bosworth.
The new proposed rule is expected to be published
in the Federal Register within a week of Veneman's
announcement. It is available at
www.fs.fed.us,
and public comments will be taken for 60 days once
the proposed rule is published.
Written comments may be mailed to: Content Analysis
Team, ATTN: Roadless State Petitions, USDA Forest
Service, P.O. Box 221090, Salt Lake City, UT 84122;
faxed to (801) 517-1014; or e-mailed to
statepetitionroadless@fs.fed.us. Comments also
may be submitted from
www.regulations.gov.
The roadless initiative has remained highly controversial
because of logging restrictions.
|